I'll delve further into this soon, but we're in the middle of a very busy week over here at North Pointe.

I've started listening to a great new podcast from itunes called "itunes U."
All you really get is a podcast of a professor's lecture from the subject of your choice.

My first class, Astronomy. It's fascinating to hear about the information that scientists are discovering and hearing about what we "know" about the universe.

One thing the Professor said struck me though. He told us that the Sun could not have been an original star, because it doesn't contain the same make up of the oldest stars we know of.
Now I'm going to go into this a whole lot because I have no desire to get into a Theistic Evolution vs. Young Earth Creationist debate.

What did catch my attention was how the Professor told his class that the oldest stars are made up of the same core matters of human kind and that it took the big bang to cause the make up of the stars to get to where we are today, to begin our evolutionary story.

I'll try to put it simply. To him, he found evidence that their theory of evolution is correct, because that supports his theory. Fair enough.
But what if I was to suggest the matter that scientists are measuring and hold the same components of man kind are so similar because they came from the same source and that source being the voice of God? Hydrogen and Oxygen slamming together and traveling vast distances to create human life.
Well that does make sense to me, because my bible tells me that the same voice spoke the stars into existence breathed life into the lungs of Adam.

All this to say that possibly;
One man's "big bang traces" is another's "breath of God."